Ansys

From DDL Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 6: Line 6:
There are multiple ways to generate geometry in Ansys.
There are multiple ways to generate geometry in Ansys.
-
[[Ansys1.PNG]]
+
[[Image:Ansys1.PNG]]
Figure 1. Angle Bracket
Figure 1. Angle Bracket

Revision as of 11:55, 12 January 2007

Effect of Modelling on Ansys

Ansys is a finite element analysis software used for numerically solving static/dynamic structural problems, thermal, electromagnetics, acoustics and fluid problems. The results that are obtained reflect how the model was generated, loaded and meshed. When performing a geometry optimization using Ansys, users must take into account all of these factors. By exploring a case study, the sensitivity of Ansys to these changes can be visualized. Modelling

There are multiple ways to generate geometry in Ansys.

Image:Ansys1.PNG

Figure 1. Angle Bracket

Using log files obtained from a CMU undergrad mechanical engineering course, there were two main methods in which users approached this problem. Method 1

   *
     1. [[[Image:1_1.JPG]]]
         o
           Figure 2. Created two rectangles 
     2. [[[Image:1_2.JPG]]]
         o
           Figure 3. Rounded corners 
     3. [[[Image:1_3.bmp]]]
         o
           Figure 4. Filleted with lines 
     4. [[[Image:1_4.bmp]]]
         o
           Figure 5. Filleted with lines 
     5. [[[Image:1_5.bmp]]]
         o
           Figure 6. Subtracted area of hole 

Method 2

   *
     1. [[[Image:2_1.bmp]]]
         o
           Figure 7. Created arcs 
     2. [[[Image:2_2.bmp]]]
         o
           Figure 8. Created arcs 
     3. [[[Image:2_3.bmp]]]
         o
           Figure 9. Created lines 
     4. [[[Image:2_4.bmp]]]
         o
           Figure 10. Created area 
     5. [[[Image:2_5.bmp]]]
         o
           Figure 11. Subtracted area of hole 

Modelling Path

[[[Image:modellingpath.JPG]]]

Figure 12. Meshing

[[[Image:meshing.JPG]]] 2/15 used an element mesh size of .25 while 13/15 used an element mesh size of .5. Figure 13. Loading

   *
     6/15 users accounted for depth and applied 80 psi
   *
     8/15 used 10 psi from the diagram
   *
     1/15 did not use either
   *
     All users applied 0 displacement 

Results

[[[Image:meshingerror.JPG]]]

   *
     With constant pressure, average difference due to modelling is 19.94%
   *
     WIth constant pressure and constant mesh size, average difference is 23%
   *
     Meshing affected the results by 3% 

[[[Image:pressurediff.JPG]]]

   *
     Same model given two different pressures
   *
     Percent difference due to pressure difference is 87.5% 

Conclusion

   *
     The greater the difference in modelling, the greater the difference in Ansys results.
   *
     By setting a tighter criterion for convergence, the difference due to meshing should go to zero.
   *
     The same loading will produce the same results. 

Links

   *
     http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ANSYS
   *
     http://computing.ee.ethz.ch/sepp/ansys-6.0-bo/structural_tut.html
Personal tools