Keg tap redesign

From DDL Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Appendix)
Current revision (23:42, 6 October 2009) (view source)
(Team Member Roles)
 
(86 intermediate revisions not shown.)
Line 1: Line 1:
=Executive Summary=
=Executive Summary=
 +
 +
In this phase of the design process, further investigation of consumer needs was accomplished through market research. First, a survey was distributed to a variety of consumers. The survey responses showed that consumers mainly desire an intuitive tap design, reduced foam output, a simple way to keep the keg cold, a better pumping mechanism, and a faster dispensing method. Interviews with store managers were then conducted to determine the needs of beer distributors. It was found that when purchasing taps, distributors look for ones that are easy to disassemble, composed of standard parts, easy to clean, and highly durable.
 +
 +
After brainstorming, we narrowed our ideas into five main design concepts that satisfy the three most common user needs: foam reduction, keg refrigeration, and line reduction. For foam reduction, concepts include a pressure gauge to limit misuse, a separate beer reservoir to force the foam to the top, and a double barrel pump to facilitate pumping and improve the center cylinder. Other concepts are a beer cooling system using coiled tubes surrounded by ice and a multiple hose connector that limits line length at gatherings.
 +
 +
With some research, we found three main designs similar to our own: the "Tap with Spout" (Reference 1), "Jockey Box" (Reference 2), and a multiple hose design (Reference 3). A Pugh chart was created to compare and contrast our concept ideas against these as well as the standard tap. One key advantage to our design is that the competitors do nothing to reduce foam. Also, although the competing designs effectively satisfy individual user needs, they are very expensive.
 +
 +
By analyzing the market research, user studies, and competitor designs, it seems evident that the optimal keg tap redesign would be a combination of our concepts. The recommended combination includes the double barrel pump, the pressure gauge, and multiple hoses. To manage all the tasks at hand, a Gantt chart was also created to map out the design and prototype schedule.
=Market Research=
=Market Research=
-
Provide description of market research and observations. Include pictures to communicate key observations where possible. Summarize top stakeholder product needs in a list.
+
The two markets researched were consumers and beer distributors. We conducted interviews and collected survey responses to gain insight as to what customers look for in a keg tap and gauge market need.
 +
==Beer Distributors==
-
-----------------------Keg Use Survey----------------------
+
To determine the needs of beer distributors, we interviewed the store managers. We found that most distributors own about 50 taps and need to restock every few months.  They restock mainly because customers do not return the taps after use.  We also found that workers routinely disassemble the taps for cleaning.  From these interviews, we learned that beer distributors want keg taps that are:
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
+
-
1. What age group do you belong to? (undergraduate student, graduate student, young professional, adult)
+
-
--------------------------------------------------------------------
+
-
Three Adult responses, one graduate student, one young professional, 12 undergraduate students
+
 +
* Easy to disassemble
 +
* Composed of standard parts to facilitate part replacement
 +
* Simple to clean
 +
* Durable enough to withstand customer abuse
 +
==Consumers==
-
+
For consumers, we distributed a survey to students, young professionals, and adults in order to get responses from a representative sample of all potential keg tap users. The goals of the survey were to identify the target demographic, key complaints, advantages and disadvantages of keg use as opposed to bottles, and other customer needs.  From the survey results, we found that consumers mainly desire the following:
-
2. How often do you find yourself drinking from a keg? (never, daily, weekly, few times a month, few times  a year, used to in college but no longer do)
+
-
--------------------------------------------------------------------
+
-
10 few times a year, 5 few times a month, 1 weekly, 1 never
+
 +
* Intuitive tap design
 +
* Reduced foam output
 +
* Simple way to keep keg cold
 +
* Better pumping mechanism
 +
* Faster dispensing method
-
 
-
3. Have you ever experienced issues getting beer out of a keg? (for example: too much foam, difficult to pump, long line to fill cup).  If you have never received a beverage from a keg, write N/A.
 
-
--------------------------------------------------------------------
 
-
# Too much foam, some taps dispense too slowly
 
-
# The biggest problem for me is when the keg was just tapped, may be still warm and/or shaken up, and you have to wait a while until you can get anything but foam out of it.
 
-
# Yes.  Long lines, too much foam, having to continuously pump the keg, and difficulty getting the last bit out of the keg.
 
-
# I was trying to do a keg stand once and some lady pumped the keg way too much so it overflowed/foamed all over my face.
 
-
# Too much foam
 
-
# Too much foam, long line, slow flow, tap breaking in the middle of filling up a cup, difficult to pump
 
-
# Foam
 
-
# Yes, too much foam
 
-
# Long lines at parties every time
 
-
# Long lines to fill cup and too much foam
 
-
# Too much foam, long line to fill cup, difficult to pump
 
-
# Yes, difficult to pump, too much foam
 
-
# Foam, difficult to pump, long line, though the taps aren’t always at fault
 
-
# No issues
 
-
# Foaming
 
-
# Yes, usually either too much foam or a bad seal which makes it hard to get pressure from pumping
 
-
# Too much foam, long line
 
 +
The survey questions along with common responses are summarized below.
 +
 +
===Keg Use Survey===
 +
 +
For the following survey, over 100 responses were collected: approximately 85% from college students, 10% from young professionals, and 5% from adults.  About three-quarters of those surveyed drink from a keg a few times a month; the remainder reported consuming beer from a keg on a less regular basis (a few times a year, used to in college but no longer do, and never).  The questions are based on home keg use as opposed to beer on tap at bars.
 +
 +
<br />
 +
 +
'''1. What issues have you experienced getting beer out of a keg?'''
 +
 +
Of the approximately 100 people surveyed, 90% had issues with too much foam, 81% experienced long lines to fill up their cup, and 50% found it difficult to pump the tap.
 +
 +
Other issues included:
 +
 +
* Tap dispensing beer too slowly
 +
* Difficulty getting the last bit of beer out of the keg
 +
* Trouble with keg stands
 +
* Tap breaking
 +
 +
<br />
 +
 +
'''2. What are some advantages/disadvantages to buying a keg instead of cans or bottles?
 +
 +
''Advantages:''
 +
* Much cheaper than cans/bottles
 +
* Reduced waste and smaller environmental impact
 +
* Easier to clean up
 +
* Carbonation level better from keg
 +
* Assuming the keg is new/has been well taken care of, the beverage quality is generally higher (less chance of skunking or tasting like metal)
 +
* Easier to provide for large groups of people
 +
* Can be delivered
 +
* Don’t need to search for a bottle opener.
 +
 +
''Disadvantages:''
 +
* Have to return keg
 +
* Keg needs to stay cold until you’re done with it
 +
* Less variety with kegs than bottles and cans
 +
* May be tougher to monitor consumption i.e. not knowing what is in a certain guest’s cup and harder to keep track of the number of beers you’ve had when refilling a cup
 +
* Negative perception of “keggers” versus a more mature party with premium beers
 +
* Finding a place to put the keg
 +
* Accepting that kegs are unattractive
 +
* Tap could break
 +
* If keg isn't finished the beer will go bad and be a waste
 +
* Kegs are heavy and hard to move
 +
* Issues with foam
 +
* Kegs are banned at some schools
 +
 +
<br />
 +
 +
'''3. What events would you purchase a keg for?'''
 +
 +
* Any large, casual party
 +
* Tailgating
 +
* Barbeques
 +
* Camping
 +
 +
<br />
 +
 +
'''4. Have you ever tapped a keg?  What problems did you have, if any?'''
 +
 +
* The tap would not stay screwed into the keg (may have been broken)
 +
* Difficult to screw the tap on properly
 +
* Not familiar with type of tap (keg tap not intuitive)
 +
* Beer sprayed all over the place because of old or broken seal
 +
* Pressure lost so the keg had to be retapped
 +
* Incompatible tap-keg connections
 +
 +
<br />
 +
 +
'''5. What would you look for when purchasing a keg tap?'''
 +
 +
* Large, stationary upright tap as opposed to a long tube and tiny nozzle
 +
* Sturdy feel (the piston doesn’t wobble)
 +
* Low cost
 +
* Durable
 +
* Good pumping and dispensing mechanisms
 +
* Quality materials
 +
* Intuitive/Easy to use
 +
* Multiple nozzles
 +
* Good grip on the dispenser
 +
* Lightweight
 +
* Easy to wash 
 +
* Long hose with a sturdy nozzle
 +
* Compatible with a broad array of kegs
 +
* Maximum beer flow
 +
 +
<br />
   
   
-
4. What are some advantages/disadvantages to buying a keg instead of cans or bottles?
+
'''6. How could your overall keg experience be improved?'''
-
--------------------------------------------------------------------
+
 
-
# Advantages: cost per beer, ability to use pitchers, ease of clean up, like beers form a keg because carbonation level is better
+
* Way to chill keg
-
Disadvantages: having to return keg, having to chill the keg until you’re done with it (more of a headache in warmer weather & climates), less variety than bottles and cans, may be tougher to monitor consumption i.e. not knowing what is in a certain guest’s cup and harder to keep track of the number of beers you’ve had when refilling a cup, negative perception of “keggers” versus a more mature party with premium beers, finding a place to put the keg and accepting that they are just plain unattractive.
+
* Pressure gauge to prevent over pumping
-
# It’s much cheaper. Also, if you use real glasses (which most people don't...) there is no waste left over when you’re done with a keg.
+
* Make a keg like a Gatorade cooler with a spigot at the bottom and no tap
-
# Mainly cost and draught beer tastes better.  Also, environmental impact.
+
* Handle that doesn't protrude so far off the keg (pump handle like most large ketchup dispensers)
-
# The reason that people buy a keg is so that they can get a large amount of alcohol in one container (I think), and there isn’t really a better way to extract the beer than using a pump.  Some disadvantages would be the need to pump the keg to get the beer out and the fact that now people need cups (cleaning up to do after the party).  Also, if there is only one keg present at a party, there will be a long line of thirsty people.  Advantage of cans: no need for pumping, people don’t have to wait to get their alcohol; Disadvantages: a mess to clean up.  Advantage of bottles: No need to pump, you can show off your bottle opening skills (without a bottle opener), no line.  Disadvantages: mess to clean up, dangerous if possessed by an angry drunk.
+
* Eliminate foam
-
# Less clean up, easier to provide for larger groups of people
+
* Multiple hoses
-
# Advantages: cheaper, no clean up of cans, can be delivered.  Disadvantages: can break, if not finished will go bad and be a waste, heavy and hard to move, foam issues if not purchased early enough before the party
+
* Push a button to automatically pump the keg to an optimal pressure
-
# Advantages: Kegs are cheaper and you can do keg stands.  Disadvantages: Not allowed to have in fraternity house
+
* Stronger flow from tap
-
# Have to finish the whole thing within a couple of days, great for a party but not so good if you’re just a couple of people trying to finish it off.  Keg’s probably a lot cheaper per pint.  You don’t need to go looking for a bottle opener.  Bit hard to refrigerate, also feel like a little bit of the beer is wasted at the bottom
+
* Way to preserve beer left over in keg so it doesn't go bad
-
# Good for the environment!
+
* Keg with wheels for ease of transport
-
# Cheaper? More environmentally friendly?  Though plastic cups probably aren’t that great for the environment either…
+
* Add light so that you can see where you’re pouring at night
-
# Advantages: Cheaper.  Disadvantages: tap, how to keep the booze cold, have to return keg
+
* More suitable for keg stands
-
# Much less trash, usually cheaper than individually bottled beers, serves a large party better (people can get their own drinks and refills), less need for a huge fridge (although it’s harder to keep it cold)…
+
* More intuitive
-
# Even after can returns, a keg is significantly cheaper.  Their environmental impact is smaller since they are only rarely discarded.  And, assuming the keg is new/has been well taken care of, the beverage quality is generally higher (less chance of skunking or tasting like metal)
+
* Rubber on keg handles to make carrying it easier
-
# Less clean up
+
* Have only open or closed option for nozzle
-
# If on tap - the ability to draw a nice cold one at any time in any quantity.  Disadvantage is the difficulty in keeping it for some time – too large a quantity to consume.  Don’t know how long it can actually be kept.
+
* More pressure per pump (foot pump?)
-
# Cheaper to buy in bulk, usually attracts more of a crowd.  Also a pain to register and deal with the return, etc
+
* Keep cost down (no CO2 canisters)
-
# Better volume.  Cups vs. cans is easier to clean up in my opinion
+
 
-
+
==Results Summary==
-
5. What events would you purchase a keg for?  If you have purchased a keg, did you experience any issues with it? (for example: transport, keeping it cold)
+
 
-
--------------------------------------------------------------------
+
The market research demonstrates that there are many potential areas for improvement in keg tap design. Beer distributors desire a durable tap that is easy to disassemble and cleanConsumers focus more on use issues such as foamy beer, keeping the keg cold, difficulty pumping, and standing in long lines to fill a cupSome user complaints can be attributed to misuse of the tap. Misuse could be easily prevented by providing directions, but based on the nature of the product, directions would probably never be readAlternatively, the keg tap could be constructed in a more intuitive way, have arrows printed on it demonstrating the proper tapping method, or include a pressure gauge to indicate how many pumps are needed to dispense non-foamy beer.
-
# Any large, casual party.  Keeping it cold is a pain.  Had problems with foaming.
+
 
-
# Parties are just about the only event I have a keg for.
+
Due to the large percentage of responses complaining about the foam, much of our brainstorming focused on fixing that problemWe also had multiple ideas for improving access to the beer and cooling it more efficientlyThe keg tap redesign concepts reflect what we have determined to be the leading market needs.
-
# Tailgating and barbeques.  Anytime I have a lot of people.  Yes, they are heavy and it’s difficult to cool them quickly.
+
 
-
# If and only if there is a keg-stand contest or just if there are people who love keg-stands. 
+
<br />
-
# Parties, family holidays
+
-
# Purchased for parties.  It can be hard to keep cold and move to the appropriate location if there are steps/small spaces/no strong people around
+
-
# Parties
+
-
# A party, barbeque, birthday, one of those small Heineken kegs if it’s 8 of us or so
+
-
# Frat parties are the only place I’ve ever seen them commonly
+
-
# I’ve never bought a keg before, but they have them for school-wide parties
+
-
# Any party with more than 20 people.  No real issues with buying the keg except getting it into my building.  Simply kept in a huge bucket with an ice bag on it.
+
-
# Party? Oktoberfest, greek party, tailgating, camping…etc
+
-
# I’ve bought two kegs.  Both at the same time for a party weekend at my college.  We kept one in the refrigerator (not tapped) and the other in a trash can packed with ice.
+
-
# Too heavy- so transport, definitely a man’s job
+
-
# Larger parties in general.  Only transport issues deal with the size and weight of it
+
-
# Party.  No unexpected issues, obviously need to keep it cold with ice or kegerator
+
-
# Party
+
-
+
-
6. Have you ever tapped a keg?  What problems did you have, if any?
+
-
--------------------------------------------------------------------
+
-
# Yes, no problems
+
-
# I have tapped a keg.  The only problem I have had was that one time the tap would not stay screwed into the keg, although I think that tap may have been kind of broken.
+
-
# Yes, it was difficult to get the tap on properly (issues with the threading)
+
-
# Nope
+
-
# No
+
-
# I tried to, but the tap was different or maybe just broken and would not tap
+
-
# Nope
+
-
# No
+
-
# Nope
+
-
# No
+
-
# General problems: Beer spraying all over the place, losing pressure so it has to be retapped
+
-
# Nope
+
-
# Yes, I’ve tapped a few, if the tap’s seal is old or broken it doesn’t work very well
+
-
# No
+
-
# Yes, many times.  Generally no problems tapping it –as long as it is the right tap! There are several incompatible formats.  Problems happen after tapping i.e. foaming
+
-
# Yes, sometimes one of the notches won’t fit in when you need to turn the keg and beer will squirt out, very frustrating
+
-
# No, I have never tapped a keg
+
-
+
-
7. What would you look for when purchasing a keg tap?
+
-
--------------------------------------------------------------------
+
-
# I prefer the large, stationary upright taps to the ones with a long tube and a tiny nozzle.  They pour better, look better, and are easier to use.  Plus the nozzle can’t get tossed onto something yucky.  The only downside to the big taps is that it is more likely for the beer to come out too fast and foamy when the keg is over-pressurizedAlso some people will open it halfway and it gets foamy then too.
+
-
# Probably a sturdy feel (the piston doesn’t wobble), and a hose that looks like it will hold a seal for a while.
+
-
# Cost vs. durability.  Also how it is actuated (both pumping and dispensing)
+
-
# No idea.
+
-
# N/A
+
-
# Good price, good seals, good materials
+
-
# No clue
+
-
# Not too complicated/ difficult to open, doesn’t leak?
+
-
# ??
+
-
# Not sure exactly…I’ve never bought one
+
-
# Multiple nozzles
+
-
# Functionality, reasonable price, quality (good grip on the dispenser, doesn’t get too sticky), perhaps lightweight?  Easy to wash, like machine washable or something
+
-
# I wouldn’t, as you can generally rent them along with the keg.  However, if I were to, I’d want the hose to be long with a decently sturdy nozzleI don’t know much about engineering, but a longer handle would probably be easier to deal with, since making 100s of short strokes really stinks, instead pumping the tap a few dozen times to fill a pitcher would be good.
+
-
# Don’t really know… easy to use I guess
+
-
# Any purchased keg tap would have to be compatible with a broad array of kegs –otherwise you can only buy specific beers
+
-
# Ease of use, low cost, durable, and designed to maximize beer flow.  A good flow with not too much foam but not too long to pour.  Also should be easy to use and not take too many pumps to build up pressure.
+
-
# Says it prevents foaminess, cheap
+
-
+
-
8. How could your overall keg experience be improved?  Please include any suggestions you may have.
+
-
--------------------------------------------------------------------
+
-
# My biggest complaint is chilling the kegAlso, too often knuckleheads over-pump the keg so some kind of pressure meter would help.
+
-
# I always kind of wished that kegs were like big Gatorade coolers with a spigot at the bottom and no tap, but I realize this may be impractical for design reasons.  On a more serious note, it would be nice if the tap didn’t stick so far off the keg; sometimes I feel like I could pump it wrong and snap it off.  A pump handle like most large ketchup dispensers would be cool.
+
-
# Make it easier to pump, easier to cool, and eliminate foam.  Actually, make a tube that I can hook directly to myself so that I can drink as much as I want at will.
+
-
# Multiple hoses (good luck dealing with the pressure problem); push a button to automatically pump the keg to an optimal pressure
+
-
# Not enough experience to answer this question
+
-
# Improvements on how strong the flow is from the tap, less foam, multiple hoses from a tap so more than one person can fill at a time and flow rate of the beer is not compromised, longer lasting
+
-
# Better beer in them
+
-
# Make kegs with wheels so you can wheel them around, less foam (one of the main things)I like the mini kegs that Heineken does, good small size for small gatherings.  Would totally be awesome if it came with a little light so that you can see where you’re pouring (at night). Make it more suitable for keg stands
+
-
# More intuitive would be good
+
-
# Only once have I ever served myself from a kegI remember it being slow.  When someone fills up my cup from a keg it usually takes a while.
+
-
# xxx
+
-
# More keg stands
+
-
# Raise the rim of the keg to allow more ice to be packed around it.  Put rubber on the handles to make carrying them easier
+
-
# Considering that I’m a cocktail drinker, I don’t have any suggestions
+
-
# In general foaming is the biggest problem.  Also, it seems that regulating the flow out is inconsistent –i.e. when the tap is open just slightly, my experience is that the foaming is significantly increased (perhaps by the additional turbulence at the valve opening).
+
-
# Find a way to create more pressure per pump.  Maybe with a foot pump instead of pumping by hand.  I think that a manual pump is necessary, as compared to taps getting pressure from CO2, to keep costs down.  Also maybe a tap with a pressure gauge on it letting you know when you have an ideal amount of pressure built up
+
-
# Reduce the foam
+
=Design Concepts=
=Design Concepts=
-
Provide sketches and descriptions of top 3-5 design concepts, describing what opportunities have been identified and how they will be addressed.
+
Based on our survey results, the key areas of improvement are foam reduction, keg refrigeration, and line reduction. While the 5 main concepts below fulfill these specific areas, other improvements will also be made. Ease of use, environmental impact, cost, and aesthetics will all be taken into account, and general improvements in these areas will be automatic. A more comprehensive list of ideas can be found in the appendix.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
[[Image:PressureGauge1.jpg|right|thumb|Figure 1. Pressure Gauge]]
 +
'''Issue 1: Foam Reduction'''
 +
 
 +
Concept Solutions:
 +
 
 +
* Pressure Gauge
 +
 
 +
A simple pressure gauge is something that could limit the chance of misuse by telling the user when the keg is at the ideal pressure. If we also added a release valve, this would take it a step further by entirely preventing the user from over-pumping. Ideally the gauge would be attached to the tap at the point where air is coming back out of the keg. An illustration of this is shown in Figure 1.
 +
 
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
 
 +
[[Image:SeparateReservoir.jpg|right|thumb|Figure 2. Seperate Reservoir]]
 +
* Separate Beer Reservoir
 +
 
 +
A separate beer reservoir is another concept idea that would reduce foam. By having the beer enter a separate container at a high point and exit at a low point, the foam would ideally rise to the top, while the beer would exit out the hose. Whether the separate reservoir is internal or external is yet to be determined. An illustration of this general concept can be seen in Figure 2.
 +
 
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
 
 +
[[Image:DoubleBarrelPump.jpg|right|thumb|Figure 3. Double Barrel Pump]]
 +
* Double Barrel Pump
 +
 
 +
The Double Barrel Pump is a concept that could potentially both reduce foam and facilitate pumping. With more air going into the keg, less pumps would be necessary. Also, this design would change the center cylinder, which is a key source of turbulence. In the Double Barrel Pump design, the beer would flow in a straight path, while the air flow would have a curved path. This is the opposite from standard center cylinders, where the beer is forced around many sharp turns and tight corners. An illustration of the double barrel pump is shown in Figure 3.
 +
 
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
 
 +
[[Image:CoolingSystem.jpg|right|thumb|Figure 4. Cooling System]]
 +
'''Issue 2: Keg refrigeration'''
 +
 
 +
Concept Solution:
 +
 
 +
* Coiled tubes in ice bath
 +
 
 +
Since finding containers to hold a keg can often be difficult, and the ice can be messy, this solution would minimize these issues. A container would be placed on top of the keg with the beer tube coiled around a centered cylinder. The container would then be filled with ice in order to cool the beer flowing out of the tube. It would probably take quite a length of tubing, but this could be determined by applying heat transfer calculations. Also, the shape of the container might change depending on whether it is manually pumped (there would need to be a hole to access the plunger), or if it would have a built-in C02 canister to regulate the pressure. A general illustration of this concept is shown in Figure 4.
 +
 
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
 
 +
 
 +
[[Image:MultipleHoses.jpg|right|thumb|Figure 5. Multiple Hoses]]
 +
'''Issue 3: Distribution Improvement'''
 +
 
 +
Concept Solution:
 +
 
 +
* Multiple hoses
 +
 
 +
Multiple hoses is a relatively simple solution to minimizing the waiting period for a beer. This is an idea that would definitely have to be paired with another concept, as it doesn't help to limit foam. While the illustration shows hoses coming out of the same opening in the tap, this might not be the case. Also, the tubing could potentially be elimated in favor of a series of spouts. A concept sketch is shown in Figure 5.
 +
 
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
=Competitor Products=
=Competitor Products=
-
Identify relevant competitor products from your patent searches, commercial searches, web searches, and expert interviews. Compare pros and cons of each concept on a standard Pugh chart against your top stakeholder needs, and benchmark against the most relevant competitors. If your concepts are better on some attributes and worse on others, identify any market segments likely to value the tradeoffs you can offer.  
+
After doing multiple searches and interviewing the owner of a large beer distributor some competing products were identified in the table.  These products were all found on a website that was given to us by the beer distributor.  The "Tap with Spout", "Jockey Box", and "Multiple Hoses" pictures were all taken from references 1, 2, and 3 respectively. In addition to the competing products we found, we also listed our five best designs and compared them all to the tap we disassembled in the following Pugh chart.
 +
<br /> 
 +
 
 +
[[Image:PUGH_CHART_3.jpg|frame|none|Figure 6. Pugh Chart]]
 +
 
 +
<br />
 +
As you can easily see our designs were thought of in attempt to fix certain complaints from our user surveys.  The first three designs are our attempts to reduce foam, the fourth is to cool the beer, and the last attempts to serve the beer more quickly.  Our designs to reduce foam seem to be promising as competitors seem to be lacking thereWe also feel as though some of our designs may be easier to use than current taps.  Out performing our competition in these two categories is at the top of our list of things to accomplish.  That being said we have thought of multiple ways to combine some of these ideas in order to increase the positive aspects from our redesign.
=Design Plan=
=Design Plan=
-
Provide a Gantt chart to map out the team plan for design and prototyping through the remainder of the semester. Be detailed about our particular project and member contributions.  
+
 
 +
 
 +
[[Image:KegTapGannt.jpg|frame|none|Figure 7. Gantt Chart]]
=Key Findings=
=Key Findings=
-
Summarize findings and recommendations. In particular, identify which concept you recommend pursuing for the remainder of the semester. Provide a hypothetical user scenario representative of our target market from our research findings to motivate top solution concept.  
+
By looking at the results from user testing, the survey, and Pugh chart, we have found that a combination of our concepts is necessary. When looking at competitor products, we noticed that there aren't any attempts at foam reduction for personal keg use. And while we found competitors to have several efficient ways to cool beer, they were all very costly. Thus, we recommend combining two of the foam reduction concepts with one of the other areas of improvement. Specifically, we recommend combining the pressure gauge, to limit misuse, the double barrel pump, to facilitate pumping and improve the center cylinder, and a multiple hose attachment to fill more than one cup at a time. In an ideal situation, the beer would have the right amount of foam, it would be dispensed quickly, and it would be more easily tapped. Take a college party as an example. The hosts, busy with other preparations, cannot deal with the keg, so they pass off the tap to an inexperienced drinker.  Our tap is very intuitive, so the inexperienced drinker has no problem tapping the keg.  The party starts, and no line forms at the bar because there are multiple hoses to fill cups.  The double barrel pump dispenses the beer with very little foam, pleasing both the guests, since they have a full cup of liquid, and the hosts, since they waste less beer.  We believe that this scenario illustrates how user needs can be met by combining our concepts.
=Team Member Roles=
=Team Member Roles=
-
Include process summary.
+
While the majority of the sections were done by the group as a whole, each person helped in the following areas:
 +
 
 +
'''Dan Boljonis:''' Gantt chart, market research
 +
 
 +
'''Keith Haselhoff:''' Competitor research, Pugh chart
 +
 
 +
'''Abby Morrell:''' Design concept sketches and descriptions, findings & recommendations, executive summary
 +
 
 +
'''Julia Weirman:''' Market research, created survey and compiled results, editing
=References=
=References=
 +
 +
#  http://www.micromatic.com/draft-keg-beer/keg-pumps-cid-829.html
 +
#  http://www.micromatic.com/draft-keg-beer/jockey-boxes-cid-163.html
 +
#  http://www.micromatic.com/draft-keg-beer/keg-pumps-cid-2467.html
=Appendix=
=Appendix=
Line 177: Line 279:
# Instead of hoses have a reservoir with spouts
# Instead of hoses have a reservoir with spouts
# Flatten the keg on one side
# Flatten the keg on one side
-
# Carbon Dioxide cannister
+
# Carbon Dioxide canister
# Keg stand helper
# Keg stand helper
# Wheels on keg
# Wheels on keg
# Flatter, more rectangular handle
# Flatter, more rectangular handle
# Strap for carrying keg
# Strap for carrying keg
 +
# Motorized keg
# Tubing to cool beer
# Tubing to cool beer
# Cooling Koozie
# Cooling Koozie
Line 192: Line 295:
# Quarter dispenser
# Quarter dispenser
# Fold-out table
# Fold-out table
 +
# Keg grill
# Pump into separate reserve
# Pump into separate reserve
# Cooled reserve
# Cooled reserve
Line 261: Line 365:
# Instead of flowing through coils, beer flows over cold surface into cup
# Instead of flowing through coils, beer flows over cold surface into cup
# Handle turns red when keg nears empty
# Handle turns red when keg nears empty
 +
# Rack for holding keg
 +
# Container that has drain for water when ice melts
 +
# Holder to place cup at proper angle
 +
# Thermo-electric cooling keg
 +
# Comfort grips for keg stands
 +
# Camouflage keg
 +
# American pride keg

Current revision

Contents

Executive Summary

In this phase of the design process, further investigation of consumer needs was accomplished through market research. First, a survey was distributed to a variety of consumers. The survey responses showed that consumers mainly desire an intuitive tap design, reduced foam output, a simple way to keep the keg cold, a better pumping mechanism, and a faster dispensing method. Interviews with store managers were then conducted to determine the needs of beer distributors. It was found that when purchasing taps, distributors look for ones that are easy to disassemble, composed of standard parts, easy to clean, and highly durable.

After brainstorming, we narrowed our ideas into five main design concepts that satisfy the three most common user needs: foam reduction, keg refrigeration, and line reduction. For foam reduction, concepts include a pressure gauge to limit misuse, a separate beer reservoir to force the foam to the top, and a double barrel pump to facilitate pumping and improve the center cylinder. Other concepts are a beer cooling system using coiled tubes surrounded by ice and a multiple hose connector that limits line length at gatherings.

With some research, we found three main designs similar to our own: the "Tap with Spout" (Reference 1), "Jockey Box" (Reference 2), and a multiple hose design (Reference 3). A Pugh chart was created to compare and contrast our concept ideas against these as well as the standard tap. One key advantage to our design is that the competitors do nothing to reduce foam. Also, although the competing designs effectively satisfy individual user needs, they are very expensive.

By analyzing the market research, user studies, and competitor designs, it seems evident that the optimal keg tap redesign would be a combination of our concepts. The recommended combination includes the double barrel pump, the pressure gauge, and multiple hoses. To manage all the tasks at hand, a Gantt chart was also created to map out the design and prototype schedule.

Market Research

The two markets researched were consumers and beer distributors. We conducted interviews and collected survey responses to gain insight as to what customers look for in a keg tap and gauge market need.

Beer Distributors

To determine the needs of beer distributors, we interviewed the store managers. We found that most distributors own about 50 taps and need to restock every few months. They restock mainly because customers do not return the taps after use. We also found that workers routinely disassemble the taps for cleaning. From these interviews, we learned that beer distributors want keg taps that are:

  • Easy to disassemble
  • Composed of standard parts to facilitate part replacement
  • Simple to clean
  • Durable enough to withstand customer abuse

Consumers

For consumers, we distributed a survey to students, young professionals, and adults in order to get responses from a representative sample of all potential keg tap users. The goals of the survey were to identify the target demographic, key complaints, advantages and disadvantages of keg use as opposed to bottles, and other customer needs. From the survey results, we found that consumers mainly desire the following:

  • Intuitive tap design
  • Reduced foam output
  • Simple way to keep keg cold
  • Better pumping mechanism
  • Faster dispensing method


The survey questions along with common responses are summarized below.

Keg Use Survey

For the following survey, over 100 responses were collected: approximately 85% from college students, 10% from young professionals, and 5% from adults. About three-quarters of those surveyed drink from a keg a few times a month; the remainder reported consuming beer from a keg on a less regular basis (a few times a year, used to in college but no longer do, and never). The questions are based on home keg use as opposed to beer on tap at bars.


1. What issues have you experienced getting beer out of a keg?

Of the approximately 100 people surveyed, 90% had issues with too much foam, 81% experienced long lines to fill up their cup, and 50% found it difficult to pump the tap.

Other issues included:

  • Tap dispensing beer too slowly
  • Difficulty getting the last bit of beer out of the keg
  • Trouble with keg stands
  • Tap breaking


2. What are some advantages/disadvantages to buying a keg instead of cans or bottles?

Advantages:

  • Much cheaper than cans/bottles
  • Reduced waste and smaller environmental impact
  • Easier to clean up
  • Carbonation level better from keg
  • Assuming the keg is new/has been well taken care of, the beverage quality is generally higher (less chance of skunking or tasting like metal)
  • Easier to provide for large groups of people
  • Can be delivered
  • Don’t need to search for a bottle opener.

Disadvantages:

  • Have to return keg
  • Keg needs to stay cold until you’re done with it
  • Less variety with kegs than bottles and cans
  • May be tougher to monitor consumption i.e. not knowing what is in a certain guest’s cup and harder to keep track of the number of beers you’ve had when refilling a cup
  • Negative perception of “keggers” versus a more mature party with premium beers
  • Finding a place to put the keg
  • Accepting that kegs are unattractive
  • Tap could break
  • If keg isn't finished the beer will go bad and be a waste
  • Kegs are heavy and hard to move
  • Issues with foam
  • Kegs are banned at some schools


3. What events would you purchase a keg for?

  • Any large, casual party
  • Tailgating
  • Barbeques
  • Camping


4. Have you ever tapped a keg? What problems did you have, if any?

  • The tap would not stay screwed into the keg (may have been broken)
  • Difficult to screw the tap on properly
  • Not familiar with type of tap (keg tap not intuitive)
  • Beer sprayed all over the place because of old or broken seal
  • Pressure lost so the keg had to be retapped
  • Incompatible tap-keg connections


5. What would you look for when purchasing a keg tap?

  • Large, stationary upright tap as opposed to a long tube and tiny nozzle
  • Sturdy feel (the piston doesn’t wobble)
  • Low cost
  • Durable
  • Good pumping and dispensing mechanisms
  • Quality materials
  • Intuitive/Easy to use
  • Multiple nozzles
  • Good grip on the dispenser
  • Lightweight
  • Easy to wash
  • Long hose with a sturdy nozzle
  • Compatible with a broad array of kegs
  • Maximum beer flow


6. How could your overall keg experience be improved?

  • Way to chill keg
  • Pressure gauge to prevent over pumping
  • Make a keg like a Gatorade cooler with a spigot at the bottom and no tap
  • Handle that doesn't protrude so far off the keg (pump handle like most large ketchup dispensers)
  • Eliminate foam
  • Multiple hoses
  • Push a button to automatically pump the keg to an optimal pressure
  • Stronger flow from tap
  • Way to preserve beer left over in keg so it doesn't go bad
  • Keg with wheels for ease of transport
  • Add light so that you can see where you’re pouring at night
  • More suitable for keg stands
  • More intuitive
  • Rubber on keg handles to make carrying it easier
  • Have only open or closed option for nozzle
  • More pressure per pump (foot pump?)
  • Keep cost down (no CO2 canisters)

Results Summary

The market research demonstrates that there are many potential areas for improvement in keg tap design. Beer distributors desire a durable tap that is easy to disassemble and clean. Consumers focus more on use issues such as foamy beer, keeping the keg cold, difficulty pumping, and standing in long lines to fill a cup. Some user complaints can be attributed to misuse of the tap. Misuse could be easily prevented by providing directions, but based on the nature of the product, directions would probably never be read. Alternatively, the keg tap could be constructed in a more intuitive way, have arrows printed on it demonstrating the proper tapping method, or include a pressure gauge to indicate how many pumps are needed to dispense non-foamy beer.

Due to the large percentage of responses complaining about the foam, much of our brainstorming focused on fixing that problem. We also had multiple ideas for improving access to the beer and cooling it more efficiently. The keg tap redesign concepts reflect what we have determined to be the leading market needs.


Design Concepts

Based on our survey results, the key areas of improvement are foam reduction, keg refrigeration, and line reduction. While the 5 main concepts below fulfill these specific areas, other improvements will also be made. Ease of use, environmental impact, cost, and aesthetics will all be taken into account, and general improvements in these areas will be automatic. A more comprehensive list of ideas can be found in the appendix.


Figure 1. Pressure Gauge
Figure 1. Pressure Gauge

Issue 1: Foam Reduction

Concept Solutions:

  • Pressure Gauge

A simple pressure gauge is something that could limit the chance of misuse by telling the user when the keg is at the ideal pressure. If we also added a release valve, this would take it a step further by entirely preventing the user from over-pumping. Ideally the gauge would be attached to the tap at the point where air is coming back out of the keg. An illustration of this is shown in Figure 1.







Figure 2. Seperate Reservoir
Figure 2. Seperate Reservoir
  • Separate Beer Reservoir

A separate beer reservoir is another concept idea that would reduce foam. By having the beer enter a separate container at a high point and exit at a low point, the foam would ideally rise to the top, while the beer would exit out the hose. Whether the separate reservoir is internal or external is yet to be determined. An illustration of this general concept can be seen in Figure 2.









Figure 3. Double Barrel Pump
Figure 3. Double Barrel Pump
  • Double Barrel Pump

The Double Barrel Pump is a concept that could potentially both reduce foam and facilitate pumping. With more air going into the keg, less pumps would be necessary. Also, this design would change the center cylinder, which is a key source of turbulence. In the Double Barrel Pump design, the beer would flow in a straight path, while the air flow would have a curved path. This is the opposite from standard center cylinders, where the beer is forced around many sharp turns and tight corners. An illustration of the double barrel pump is shown in Figure 3.










Figure 4. Cooling System
Figure 4. Cooling System

Issue 2: Keg refrigeration

Concept Solution:

  • Coiled tubes in ice bath

Since finding containers to hold a keg can often be difficult, and the ice can be messy, this solution would minimize these issues. A container would be placed on top of the keg with the beer tube coiled around a centered cylinder. The container would then be filled with ice in order to cool the beer flowing out of the tube. It would probably take quite a length of tubing, but this could be determined by applying heat transfer calculations. Also, the shape of the container might change depending on whether it is manually pumped (there would need to be a hole to access the plunger), or if it would have a built-in C02 canister to regulate the pressure. A general illustration of this concept is shown in Figure 4.






Figure 5. Multiple Hoses
Figure 5. Multiple Hoses

Issue 3: Distribution Improvement

Concept Solution:

  • Multiple hoses

Multiple hoses is a relatively simple solution to minimizing the waiting period for a beer. This is an idea that would definitely have to be paired with another concept, as it doesn't help to limit foam. While the illustration shows hoses coming out of the same opening in the tap, this might not be the case. Also, the tubing could potentially be elimated in favor of a series of spouts. A concept sketch is shown in Figure 5.






Competitor Products

After doing multiple searches and interviewing the owner of a large beer distributor some competing products were identified in the table. These products were all found on a website that was given to us by the beer distributor. The "Tap with Spout", "Jockey Box", and "Multiple Hoses" pictures were all taken from references 1, 2, and 3 respectively. In addition to the competing products we found, we also listed our five best designs and compared them all to the tap we disassembled in the following Pugh chart.

Figure 6. Pugh Chart
Figure 6. Pugh Chart


As you can easily see our designs were thought of in attempt to fix certain complaints from our user surveys. The first three designs are our attempts to reduce foam, the fourth is to cool the beer, and the last attempts to serve the beer more quickly. Our designs to reduce foam seem to be promising as competitors seem to be lacking there. We also feel as though some of our designs may be easier to use than current taps. Out performing our competition in these two categories is at the top of our list of things to accomplish. That being said we have thought of multiple ways to combine some of these ideas in order to increase the positive aspects from our redesign.

Design Plan

Figure 7. Gantt Chart
Figure 7. Gantt Chart

Key Findings

By looking at the results from user testing, the survey, and Pugh chart, we have found that a combination of our concepts is necessary. When looking at competitor products, we noticed that there aren't any attempts at foam reduction for personal keg use. And while we found competitors to have several efficient ways to cool beer, they were all very costly. Thus, we recommend combining two of the foam reduction concepts with one of the other areas of improvement. Specifically, we recommend combining the pressure gauge, to limit misuse, the double barrel pump, to facilitate pumping and improve the center cylinder, and a multiple hose attachment to fill more than one cup at a time. In an ideal situation, the beer would have the right amount of foam, it would be dispensed quickly, and it would be more easily tapped. Take a college party as an example. The hosts, busy with other preparations, cannot deal with the keg, so they pass off the tap to an inexperienced drinker. Our tap is very intuitive, so the inexperienced drinker has no problem tapping the keg. The party starts, and no line forms at the bar because there are multiple hoses to fill cups. The double barrel pump dispenses the beer with very little foam, pleasing both the guests, since they have a full cup of liquid, and the hosts, since they waste less beer. We believe that this scenario illustrates how user needs can be met by combining our concepts.

Team Member Roles

While the majority of the sections were done by the group as a whole, each person helped in the following areas:

Dan Boljonis: Gantt chart, market research

Keith Haselhoff: Competitor research, Pugh chart

Abby Morrell: Design concept sketches and descriptions, findings & recommendations, executive summary

Julia Weirman: Market research, created survey and compiled results, editing

References

  1. http://www.micromatic.com/draft-keg-beer/keg-pumps-cid-829.html
  2. http://www.micromatic.com/draft-keg-beer/jockey-boxes-cid-163.html
  3. http://www.micromatic.com/draft-keg-beer/keg-pumps-cid-2467.html

Appendix

Brainstorming Ideas:

  1. Pressure meter
  2. Pressure release valve
  3. Flat surface to put cup on
  4. Multiple cup holders
  5. Adjustable cup holder
  6. Multiple hoses
  7. Instead of hoses have a reservoir with spouts
  8. Flatten the keg on one side
  9. Carbon Dioxide canister
  10. Keg stand helper
  11. Wheels on keg
  12. Flatter, more rectangular handle
  13. Strap for carrying keg
  14. Motorized keg
  15. Tubing to cool beer
  16. Cooling Koozie
  17. Insulated keg
  18. Instructions for tapping
  19. Larger diameter hose
  20. Empty-full gauge
  21. Cup dispenser
  22. Pong ball dispenser
  23. Quarter dispenser
  24. Fold-out table
  25. Keg grill
  26. Pump into separate reserve
  27. Cooled reserve
  28. Hose-less nozzle
  29. Breathalyzer
  30. Flow straightener
  31. Separate center cylinder
  32. Way to suck out foam faster
  33. Button to tap keg instead of pump
  34. Recirculate foam back into keg
  35. External primer
  36. Internal chamber to recirculate foam
  37. Different locking mechanism
  38. Self-assembled tap (compact packaging)
  39. Put some substance into keg to reduce foam (like Guinness bottles)
  40. Put some substannce into tap to reduce foam
  41. Keg can play music when pumped
  42. Charges ipod with pumping
  43. Nozzle only open or close
  44. Koozie to insulate keg
  45. Beer counter
  46. Pump counter
  47. Measuring device to dispense only certain amount of beer
  48. Plastic keg tap
  49. Novelty keg taps with different characters (ie. Peter Griffin, Ninja Turtles, Statue of Liberty)
  50. Keg tap with audio
  51. Voice-activated pressure gauge
  52. Magic 8 ball keg tap
  53. Sanitizer
  54. Glow in the dark keg tap
  55. Flashlight attached to nozzle
  56. Attach different beverage to nozzle to make mixed drinks
  57. Different nozzle heads (Spray, jet)
  58. Foot pump tap
  59. Electric motor
  60. Multiple kinds of beer in 1 keg
  61. Disco-light tap
  62. Fog machine
  63. Foam machine
  64. Gargoyling assist
  65. Turn a wheel instead of pumping
  66. Clear tube to see foam
  67. Plexiglass keg
  68. Strip of plexiglass to show beer level
  69. Plexiglass top only
  70. Recognition system (Only one person can tap keg)
  71. Theft reduction system
  72. Vending machine keg (Quarter per beer)
  73. Tells alcohol percentage
  74. Removable hose, different attachments
  75. Water fountain tap
  76. Beer flows out over fountain
  77. Disposable nozzle cover
  78. No lever arm on tap (twists into place)
  79. Make everything stainless steel
  80. Diamond keg tap
  81. Bigger center cylinder
  82. Hose attachment at angle or straight up
  83. Offset pump so beer comes out straight
  84. Double barrel pump (balances out moment)
  85. Use outlet tube to pump (no turns)
  86. Pump like ketchup dispenser
  87. Universal attachment (works for all kegs)
  88. Ice container with coils for cooling beer (sits on keg, attaches to tap)
  89. Dishwaster safe
  90. Garden hose nozzle adapter for easy cleaning (flush with water)
  91. Retractable hose (like in sink)
  92. Hose comes coiled, tap has holder
  93. Instead of flowing through coils, beer flows over cold surface into cup
  94. Handle turns red when keg nears empty
  95. Rack for holding keg
  96. Container that has drain for water when ice melts
  97. Holder to place cup at proper angle
  98. Thermo-electric cooling keg
  99. Comfort grips for keg stands
  100. Camouflage keg
  101. American pride keg
Personal tools