Talk:Ski boot walking attachment initial
From DDL Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(New page: ==Client comments on the Mechanical Analysis== The mechanical analysis is interesting and well-performed. The comparison of curves in the normalized height graph is nicely presented. The d...) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Client comments on the Mechanical Analysis== | ==Client comments on the Mechanical Analysis== | ||
The mechanical analysis is interesting and well-performed. The comparison of curves in the normalized height graph is nicely presented. The durability test shows the team’s additional effort, which is and useful and appreciated. My few comments: | The mechanical analysis is interesting and well-performed. The comparison of curves in the normalized height graph is nicely presented. The durability test shows the team’s additional effort, which is and useful and appreciated. My few comments: | ||
+ | *Please state your assumptions clearly. | ||
*Please include a picture in the beginning of step simulation to indicate the location of hip point, hip flex angle, knee flex angle, and ankle flex angle in the three-bar linkage representation. That will be a great help for a client reading this report. | *Please include a picture in the beginning of step simulation to indicate the location of hip point, hip flex angle, knee flex angle, and ankle flex angle in the three-bar linkage representation. That will be a great help for a client reading this report. | ||
*Please verify that the GRF equation seems not correct because force should be calculated from mass and acceleration (''d<sup>2</sup>y''/''dt<sup>2</sup>''), not velocity (''dy''/''dt''). | *Please verify that the GRF equation seems not correct because force should be calculated from mass and acceleration (''d<sup>2</sup>y''/''dt<sup>2</sup>''), not velocity (''dy''/''dt''). |
Revision as of 16:06, 2 October 2008
Client comments on the Mechanical Analysis
The mechanical analysis is interesting and well-performed. The comparison of curves in the normalized height graph is nicely presented. The durability test shows the team’s additional effort, which is and useful and appreciated. My few comments:
- Please state your assumptions clearly.
- Please include a picture in the beginning of step simulation to indicate the location of hip point, hip flex angle, knee flex angle, and ankle flex angle in the three-bar linkage representation. That will be a great help for a client reading this report.
- Please verify that the GRF equation seems not correct because force should be calculated from mass and acceleration (d2y/dt2), not velocity (dy/dt).