CMU MUSES Energy Project

From DDL Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search
Infrastructure investment and public policy set the stage for decisions made in the marketplace about which resources to use and how to use them. These decisions have life cycle implications from resource use through end of life.
Infrastructure investment and public policy set the stage for decisions made in the marketplace about which resources to use and how to use them. These decisions have life cycle implications from resource use through end of life.

This is a five year project initiated in 2006 by the Green Design Institute at Carnegie Mellon University and sponsored by the NSF MUSES program to examine material use, infrastructure change and environmental impacts for alternative fuels and vehicles.

Contents

Background

The Green Design Institute received a grant from the National Science Foundation as part of the Materials Use: Science, Engineering, and Society (MUSES) program to analyze infrastructure requirements and best technologies for a future of sustainable alternative fuels. The adoption of any alternative fuel requires changes throughout the supply chain. Even a liquid fuel such as ethanol, that is compatible with current infrastructure, can induce dramatic changes. Proper accounting of infrastructure requirements, technology capabilities, policy incentives, and likely market responses is critical to a complete analysis of material flows and environmental impacts for a transition to sustainable infrastructure. We are exploring different infrastructure options by creating scenarios for each alternative fuel and light duty vehicle option of interest. Results from this work will suggest the most promising alternatives based on multifaceted criteria considering environmental, social, and economic issues.

Approach

We use the concept of industrial ecology as our system-wide approach to analyzing the body of issues related to material flows. We conduct hybrid life cycle assessment involving both detailed process-level environmental data as well as economy-wide supply chain environmental impacts to assess the implications of infrastructure needed to produce and distribute alternative fuels. We also draw on engineering simulations and econometric models of consumer choice to predict attributes of alternative fuel vehicles and market responses to those attributes.

Scenarios

Some of the scenarios that we are examining include:

  • next generation gasoline electric hybrids improved from the current commercial versions;
  • next generation gasoline electric hybrids with a recharging, plug-in capability;
  • ethanol-fueled light duty vehicles, with infrastructure to refine and transport biomass-based ethanol;
  • hydrogen vehicles relying upon either domestic or imported liquid natural gas supplies;
  • oil sands fuels, primarily for diesel engines; and
  • bio-diesel fuel.

References

  • Graedel, T. E., and B. R. Allenby, Industrial Ecology, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2nd edition, 2003.
  • The Hydrogen Economy: Opportunities, Costs, Barriers, and R&D Needs. National Research Council and National Academy of Engineering. The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2004.
  • Morrow, W. R., W. M. Griffin, and H. S. Matthews. “Modeling switchgrass derived cellulosic ethanol distribution in the United States.” Environmental Science and Technology. Vol 40(9), 2006. pp. 2877- 2886.
  • Hendrickson, C.T., L.B. Lave, H.S. Matthews, J. Bergerson, G. Cicas, A. Horvath, S. Joshi, H.L. MacLean, D. Matthews and F.C. McMichael, “Environmental life cycle assessment of goods and services: an input-output approach,” Resources for the Future, 2006.
  • MacLean, H. L.; Lave, L. B., “Life cycle assessment of automobile/fuel options.” Environmental Science & Technology 2003, 37, 5445-5452
  • Michalek, J.J., P.Y. Papalambros and S.J. Skerlos (2004) "A study of fuel efficiency and emission policy impact on optimal vehicle design decisions," Journal of Mechanical Design, 126(6): 1062-1070.

Members

Faculty

Postdoctoral Researchers

Students

Alumni

Publications

2009

  • Costello, C., W.M. Griffin, A.E. Landis, and H.S. Matthews. 2009. Impact of Biofuel Crop Production on the Formation of Hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico. Environ. Sci. and Technol. Submitted.
  • Jaramillo, P., C. Samaras, H. Wakeley, K. Meisterling. 2009. Greenhouse gas implications of using coal for transportation: Life cycle assessment of coal-to-liquids, plug-in hybrids, and hydrogen pathways. Energy Policy 37: 2689-2695.
  • Kocoloski, M., W.M. Griffin and H.S. Matthews. 2009. Indirect Land-Use Change and Biofuel Policy. Environ. Res. Letters. Submitted.
  • Mangmeechai, A., H.S. Matthews, C.T. Hendrickson, P. Jaramillo and W.M. Griffin. 2009. Greenhouse Gas Implications of Delivering Canadian Oil Sands in the United States. Environ. Sci. and Technol. Submitted.
  • Shiau, C.-S. N., C. Samaras, R. Hauffe, J.J. Michalek. 2009. Impact of battery weight and charging patterns on the economic and environmental benefits of plug-in hybrid vehicles. Energy Policy. 37: 2653–2663.
  • Wakeley, H., C.T. Hendrickson, W.M. Griffin, H.S. Matthews. 2009. Economic and Environmental Transportation Effects of Large-Scale Ethanol Production and Distribution in the United States. Environ. Sci. and Technol., 43: 2228-2223

2008

  • Jaramillo, P., W.M. Griffin and H.S. Matthews. 2008. Comparative Analysis of the Production Costs and Life-Cycle GHG Emissions of FT-Liquid Fuels from Coal and Natural Gas. Environ. Sci. and Technol., 42:7559-7565.
  • Morrow, W.R., W.M. Griffin and H.S. Matthews. 2008. National-level Infrastructure and Economic Effects of Switchgrass Co-firing with Coal in Existing Power-plants for Carbon Mitigation. Environ. Sci. and Technol., 42:3501-3507.
  • Samaras, C. and K. Meisterling. 2008. Life Cycle Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Plug-in Hybrid Vehicles: Implications for Policy. Environ. Sci. and Technol. 43:3170-3176.
  • Shiau, C.-S. N., J.J. Michalek, C.T. Hendrickson. 2008. A Structural Analysis of Vehicle Design Responses to Corporate Average Fuel Economy Policy. Trans. Res. A., Accepted.
  • Wakeley, H., W.M. Griffin, C.T. Hendrickson and H.S. Matthews. 2008. Alternative Transportation Fuels: Distribution Infrastructure for Hydrogen and Ethanol in Iowa. ASCE J. of Infra. Systems. 14: 262-271.

2007

  • Marriott, J. and H.S. Matthews. 2007. A Disaggregated Electricity Sector Input-Output Model. Int. J. of Life Cycle Ass. Submitted.
  • Morrow, W.R., W.M. Griffin, and H.S. Matthews. 2007. State-level Infrastructure and Economic Effects of Switchgrass Co-firing with Coal in Existing Power-plants for Carbon Mitigation. Environ. Sci. and Technol. 41:6657-6662.
  • Jaramillo, P., W.M. Griffin, and H.S. Matthews. 2007. Comparative Life Cycle Air Emissions of Coal, Domestic Natural Gas, LNG, and SNG for Electricity Generation. Environmental Sci. and Technol. 41:6290-6296.

Seminar Schedule

During the fall semester 2009, MUSES seminars will be held biweekly on Mondays 3:30-4:40pm in SH 206 starting on Aug 31.

See the MUSES calendar on the GDI Calendar or the DDL Calendar for the seminar schedule.

Contact

For more information, contact H. Scott Matthews (412) 268-2940 hsm@cmu.edu

Links

Personal tools