Multiattribute utility theory

From DDL Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search

Revision as of 09:42, 6 July 2007

The purpose for using utility theory in decision making is to create a mathematical model to aid the process. It gives the decision maker the ability to quantify the desirability of certain alternatives.

Axioms

Decision theory has a set of axioms, which are meant to eliminate inconsistencies and suboptimal choices when it comes to trade-offs and uncertainty. They provide the basis for good decision making, and structures the problem so determining the utility function is more straightforward. However, it is important to remember that the axioms are just guidelines and are meant to guide decision-making. More likely it is the decision maker who is inconsistent or wrong. The first three axioms are for determining a value function to allow ranking of alternatives. The second three axioms structure a preference function.

  • Completeness of complete order: X is preferred/less preferred/equally preferred to Y
  • Transitivity: if X is preferred over Y, and Y is preferred over Z, then X is preferred over Z
  • Monotonicity: more of an attribute is preferred, or less of an attribute is preferred
  • Probabilities exist and can be quantified
  • Monotonicity of Probability: decision maker prefers a larger probability of a good outcome than a smaller probability of a good outcome
  • Substitution Independence: preferences are linear with respect to probability


Building the Utility Function

To determine the utility value, or the desirability, of the design, there are five steps.

1. Identify significant design attributes and generate alternative designs
2. Verify relevant attribute conditions
3. Evaluate Single Attribute Utility (SAU) function and trade-off preferences
4. Combine SAUs into multi-attribute utility function (MAU)
5. Select alternative with the highest MAU value by ranking the alternatives

Selection of Attributes

Attributes and their bounds are selected so that the designer's preference will be reflected in the attribute features. The range of the attribute must be selected so that it it is useful, manageable, and should indicate the expected performance of the design. When choosing the attributes, they must be:

1. Complete, such that important aspects are reflected in the design formulation
2. Operational, so that design decision analysis can be meaningfully implemented
3. Non-redundant, so there's no double counting
4. Minimal, for simplicity

Personal tools