Ceiling-mounted bicycle lift research documentation
From DDL Wiki
(→Survey Results) |
(→Survey Results) |
||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
From the survey we drew the following conclusions, | From the survey we drew the following conclusions, | ||
1. Most common responses were: | 1. Most common responses were: | ||
| - | + | Sports Equipment | |
| - | + | Clothing | |
| - | + | Books/papers | |
| - | + | Seasonal items/goods | |
2. More than 60% said they have things that could be stored more effectively and 24% said they may have things that needed more efficient storage | 2. More than 60% said they have things that could be stored more effectively and 24% said they may have things that needed more efficient storage | ||
Revision as of 01:43, 8 March 2007
Pictures of Storage
Here are some pictures we took of different storage spaces we saw.
1.) Spare bike tires
2.) Shovels
3.) Bike
4.) Hose
5.) Spare car tires
6.) Garbage
7.) Bike
8.) Carpeting
9.) Scooter
10.) Bikes
11.) Old Furniture
Survey Results
We conducted a survey to gain a better understanding for how our potential customers use storage devices. We had roughly 50 responses and the results are below:
Also, we asked customers what they would like to be stored in an effective and hidden manner. They were allowed to write in their responses. The results are below:
From the survey we drew the following conclusions, 1. Most common responses were:
Sports Equipment
Clothing
Books/papers
Seasonal items/goods
2. More than 60% said they have things that could be stored more effectively and 24% said they may have things that needed more efficient storage
3. 57% would spend between $10-25 and 26% would spend between $26-50 for a storage system
This gives us a good range to price our system and the items that consumers desire to be out of the way. Also, it is clear that there is a very positive sentiment that there is a better solution to storage and lifting systems.
