Conjoint analysis

From DDL Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 3: Line 3:
==Basic Process==
==Basic Process==
The basic process for a conjoint analysis is as follows:
The basic process for a conjoint analysis is as follows:
 +
*1. The respondent is given a set of stimulus profiles (constructed along factorial design principles in the full profile case). In the two factor approach, pairs of factors are presented, each appearing approximately an equal number of times.
 +
*2. The respondents rank or rate the stimuli according to some overall criterion, such as preference, acceptability, or likelihood of purchase.
 +
*3. In the analysis of the data, part-worths are identified for the factor levels such that each specific combination of part-worths equals the total utility of any given profile. A set of part-worths are derived for each respondent.
 +
*4. The goodness-of-fit criterion relates the derived ranking or rating of stimulus profiles to the original ranking or rating data.
 +
*5. A set of objects are defined for the choice simulator. Based on previously determined part-worths for each respondent, each simulator computes an utility value for each of the objects defined as part of the simulation.
 +
*6. Choice simulator models are invoked which rely on decision rules (first choice model, average probability model, logit model) to estimate the respondent's object of choice. Overall choice shares are computed for the sample.
 +
==Data Collection Methods==
==Data Collection Methods==
Line 18: Line 25:
   Pros:  
   Pros:  
-
Surveys can be generated by using SAS to get full-factorial and partial-factorial results.
+
Surveys can be generated by using SAS to get full-factorial and fractional-factorial results. These
-
==Data Analysis==
+
==Simulation Analysis==
logit and probit
logit and probit
Line 28: Line 35:
==External links==
==External links==
-
*[http://plato.asu.edu/donlp2.html DONLP2] is an open-sourced code of implementing SQP algorithm. The website offers packages in Fortran 77, F90 and ANSI-C versions.
+
*[http://www.sawtoothsoftware.com/qs-whatisconjoint.shtml What is conjoint analysis?] A useful conjoint software site that explains conjoint analysis in detail.
 +
*[http://www.sawtoothsoftware.com/qs-whatisconjoint.shtml SAS Software] Software for designing full-factorial and fractional factorial surveys.
==Reference==
==Reference==

Revision as of 20:06, 28 November 2006

Conjoint analysis, also known as multiattribute compositional models.

Contents

Basic Process

The basic process for a conjoint analysis is as follows:

  • 1. The respondent is given a set of stimulus profiles (constructed along factorial design principles in the full profile case). In the two factor approach, pairs of factors are presented, each appearing approximately an equal number of times.
  • 2. The respondents rank or rate the stimuli according to some overall criterion, such as preference, acceptability, or likelihood of purchase.
  • 3. In the analysis of the data, part-worths are identified for the factor levels such that each specific combination of part-worths equals the total utility of any given profile. A set of part-worths are derived for each respondent.
  • 4. The goodness-of-fit criterion relates the derived ranking or rating of stimulus profiles to the original ranking or rating data.
  • 5. A set of objects are defined for the choice simulator. Based on previously determined part-worths for each respondent, each simulator computes an utility value for each of the objects defined as part of the simulation.
  • 6. Choice simulator models are invoked which rely on decision rules (first choice model, average probability model, logit model) to estimate the respondent's object of choice. Overall choice shares are computed for the sample.


Data Collection Methods

  • Rating (e.g. rating with a scale from 1-10)
  • Ranking (e.g. rank best as 1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc.)
  • Choice (e.g. four options, which do you choose?)

The conjoint analysis can be done with different types of data, which include stated choice and revealed preference. The differences between the two are outlined below:

  • Stated choice - Using data from a survey
  Pros: - controlled experiment
  Cons: - survey item choices are not always the same as what is desired or already in the marketplace
  • Revealed Preference - Using data collected from actual results in the marketplace
  Pros: 

Surveys can be generated by using SAS to get full-factorial and fractional-factorial results. These

Simulation Analysis

logit and probit

Example

External links

  • SAS Software Software for designing full-factorial and fractional factorial surveys.

Reference

  • G.N. Vanderplaats, Numerical Optimization techniques for Engineering Design with Applications, 1984, McGraw-Hill Inc.
  • P.Y. Papalambros and D.J. Wilde, Principles of Optimal Design: Modeling and Computation, 1988, Cambridge University Press.
  • S.S. Rao, Engineering Optimization: Theory and Practice, 1996, 3rd Ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Personal tools