Talk:Paper shredder
From DDL Wiki
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | == | + | ===Additional Comments=== |
While you have shown a great deal of detail in your investigation of our product in it's various stages, you are lacking a unifying front page tying together your findings. It should summarize the various aspects of your research simply, presenting the data in an easy to ready format. Your individual sections should also feature short summations. For example, your section on components should have a short preface explaining what materials predominated your product, and how they were made. You might also consider making an appendix in which to place your large charts, leaving only the preface on the main page. | While you have shown a great deal of detail in your investigation of our product in it's various stages, you are lacking a unifying front page tying together your findings. It should summarize the various aspects of your research simply, presenting the data in an easy to ready format. Your individual sections should also feature short summations. For example, your section on components should have a short preface explaining what materials predominated your product, and how they were made. You might also consider making an appendix in which to place your large charts, leaving only the preface on the main page. | ||
| + | |||
| + | You mentioned adding a heat sink and fan as a means of solving an environmental problem. However, you also expressed the possibility of cutting down on noise levels. Wouldn't a fan be counterproductive to this goal? And what environmental problem would a heat sink and fan solve? They would dissipate waste heat faster, not reduce it. And if these were added to mitigate possible fire hazards when the shredder has been running for long periods of time, wouldn't this be better placed in the FMEA, or listed as a safety improvement? | ||
Revision as of 22:44, 15 February 2007
Additional Comments
While you have shown a great deal of detail in your investigation of our product in it's various stages, you are lacking a unifying front page tying together your findings. It should summarize the various aspects of your research simply, presenting the data in an easy to ready format. Your individual sections should also feature short summations. For example, your section on components should have a short preface explaining what materials predominated your product, and how they were made. You might also consider making an appendix in which to place your large charts, leaving only the preface on the main page.
You mentioned adding a heat sink and fan as a means of solving an environmental problem. However, you also expressed the possibility of cutting down on noise levels. Wouldn't a fan be counterproductive to this goal? And what environmental problem would a heat sink and fan solve? They would dissipate waste heat faster, not reduce it. And if these were added to mitigate possible fire hazards when the shredder has been running for long periods of time, wouldn't this be better placed in the FMEA, or listed as a safety improvement?
