Talk:Ski boot walking attachment initial

From DDL Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
==Client comments on the Mechanical Analysis==
==Client comments on the Mechanical Analysis==
The mechanical analysis is interesting and well-performed. The comparison of curves in the normalized height graph is nicely presented. The durability test shows the team’s additional effort, which is and useful and appreciated. My few comments:
The mechanical analysis is interesting and well-performed. The comparison of curves in the normalized height graph is nicely presented. The durability test shows the team’s additional effort, which is and useful and appreciated. My few comments:
-
*Please state your assumptions clearly.
+
*The Matlab analysis begins with very little information. Please state your assumptions clearly and explain how you carry out the simulation.  
-
*Please include a picture in the beginning of step simulation to indicate the location of hip point, hip flex angle, knee flex angle, and ankle flex angle in the three-bar linkage representation. That will be a great help for a client reading this report.
+
*There should many ergonomic settings in your analysis. Please explain them clearly. If any reference is used, please indicate them in your analysis.
-
*Please verify that the GRF equation seems not correct because force should be calculated from mass and acceleration (''d<sup>2</sup>y''/''dt<sup>2</sup>''), not velocity (''dy''/''dt'').
+
*A picture should be included in the beginning of step simulation to indicate the location of hip point, hip flex angle, knee flex angle, and ankle flex angle in the three-bar linkage representation. That will be a great help for a client reading this report.
 +
*The GRF equation seems not correct because force should be calculated from mass and acceleration (''d<sup>2</sup>y''/''dt<sup>2</sup>''), not velocity (''dy''/''dt''). Please verify it.

Revision as of 16:45, 2 October 2008

Client comments on the Mechanical Analysis

The mechanical analysis is interesting and well-performed. The comparison of curves in the normalized height graph is nicely presented. The durability test shows the team’s additional effort, which is and useful and appreciated. My few comments:

  • The Matlab analysis begins with very little information. Please state your assumptions clearly and explain how you carry out the simulation.
  • There should many ergonomic settings in your analysis. Please explain them clearly. If any reference is used, please indicate them in your analysis.
  • A picture should be included in the beginning of step simulation to indicate the location of hip point, hip flex angle, knee flex angle, and ankle flex angle in the three-bar linkage representation. That will be a great help for a client reading this report.
  • The GRF equation seems not correct because force should be calculated from mass and acceleration (d2y/dt2), not velocity (dy/dt). Please verify it.
Personal tools