Power scrubber

From DDL Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Failure Mode and Effect Analysis)
(Failure Mode and Effect Analysis)
Line 54: Line 54:
{| class="wikitable" border="1"
{| class="wikitable" border="1"
|-
|-
-
! '''Item and Function'''
+
! Item and Function
! '''Failure Mode'''
! '''Failure Mode'''
! '''Effects of Failure'''
! '''Effects of Failure'''

Revision as of 14:33, 20 September 2012

Contents

Exectuve Summary

Major Product Stakeholder Analysis

--Overall stuff


Stakeholder Needs and Wants
Stakeholder Needs Wants
Consumer
  • Product should not require much force to hold/use (proper level of vibration, weight, etc.)
  • Energy efficiency (and soap usage reduction)
  • Customization (comfortable to use)
  • Maximize performance & minimize cost
  • Lightweight and space efficient
  • Ergonomic (material of handle part)
  • Durability (especially of the sponge)
Retailer
  • Cheap & durable materials
  • Lower electricity(batteries) use
Manufacturer
  • Cheap & easily processed materials
  • Mass production
  • Easy assembly
  • Volume-efficient materials
Shipping & Transportation
  • Lightweight
  • Durability
  • Space-efficient packaging

Product User Study

Mechanical Function

Parts List

Design For Manufacturing and Assembly

DFM

DFA

Failure Mode and Effect Analysis

Item and Function Failure Mode Effects of Failure S Causes of Failure O Design Controls D RPN Recommended Actions
Row 1, column 1 Row 1, column 2 Row 1, column 3
Row 2, column 1 Row 2, column 2 Row 2, column 3

Design For Environment

Production Use
Item purchased Power Scrubber Manufacturing Battery Sponge Soap Water
a) Picture
b) Economic Sector Name and # Small Electric appliance #335210 Primary battery manufacturing #335912 Broom, brush, and mop manufacturing #339994 Soap and cleaning compound manufacturing #325610 Water, sewage and other systems #221300
c) Reference Unit 1 item 4 batteries 1 piece 16 oz/bottle 19.5 gallon/day

The Team

Image:Group 3.jpg
Group 3: Kelle, Robert, Pam, Ted, Ben

Team Leader: Xin (Pam) Hu

DFMA Leader: Ken-Soh (Robert) Mai

FMEA Leader: Ben Antoine

DFE Leader: Kelle Patterson

User Study Leader: Shao-Chuan (Ted) Fang

References

Personal tools