DFX
From DDL Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
Current revision (12:37, 1 September 2008) (view source) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions not shown.) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | The acronym DFX refers to "Design For X", where X is a set of criteria or perspectives to explicitly | + | The acronym DFX refers to "Design For X", where X is a set of criteria or perspectives to be considered explicitly and systematically when accounting for the downstream implications of design choices. Examples include: |
* [[DFA]]: Design for assembly | * [[DFA]]: Design for assembly | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* [[DFM]]: Design for manufacturing | * [[DFM]]: Design for manufacturing | ||
* [[DFMA]]: Design for manufacturing and assembly | * [[DFMA]]: Design for manufacturing and assembly | ||
| - | * Design for maintainability | + | * [[Design for maintainability]] |
| - | * Design for reliability | + | * [[Design for market systems]] |
| - | * Design for safety | + | * [[Design for reliability]] |
| - | * Design for usability / ergonomics | + | * [[Design for safety]] |
| - | * Design for variety (product families) | + | * [[Design for usability]] / ergonomics |
| + | * [[Design for variety]] ([[product families]]) | ||
Current revision
The acronym DFX refers to "Design For X", where X is a set of criteria or perspectives to be considered explicitly and systematically when accounting for the downstream implications of design choices. Examples include:
- DFA: Design for assembly
- DFD: Design for disassembly
- DFE: Design for environment
- DFM: Design for manufacturing
- DFMA: Design for manufacturing and assembly
- Design for maintainability
- Design for market systems
- Design for reliability
- Design for safety
- Design for usability / ergonomics
- Design for variety (product families)
